From 372c92e7c1901dd7bdd1d2fd48bff205c31dca2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tuowen Zhao <ztuowen@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:52:51 -0600
Subject: remove omegacalc as subproject

---
 omegalib/examples/code_gen | 60 ----------------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 60 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 omegalib/examples/code_gen

(limited to 'omegalib/examples/code_gen')

diff --git a/omegalib/examples/code_gen b/omegalib/examples/code_gen
deleted file mode 100644
index b3a0b4e..0000000
--- a/omegalib/examples/code_gen
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,60 +0,0 @@
-# Example taken from http://www.cloog.org
-#
-
-r0:={[i,j]:i>=1 && j<=7 && j>=i-1};
-r1:={[i,j]:2<=i<=6 && 0<=j<=4};
-
-# CLooG optimized for size
-##
-## for (i=1;i<=8;i++) {
-##    for (j=i-1;j<=7;j++) {
-##      S0(i,j);
-##    }
-##    if ((i>=2)&&(i<=6)) {
-##      for (j=0;j<=4;j++) {
-##        S1(i,j);
-##      }
-##    }
-##  }
-##
-## Since CLooG might not preserve the lexcicographical order other than
-## the default code generation strategy (custom -f or -l values). Its
-## generated code might not be correct should there exist reorder-preventing
-## dependence among statements.
-##
-
-# no overhead removal, minimal code size
-codegen 0 r0,r1;
-
-# remove one-deep loop nest (innermost loop) overhead
-codegen 1 r0,r1;
-
-# CLooG optimized for control
-##
-## for (t2=0;t2<=7;t2++) {
-##   S0(1,t2);
-## }
-## for (t1=2;t1<=6;t1++) {
-##   for (t2=0;t2<=t1-2;t2++) {
-##     S1(t1,t2);
-##   }
-##   for (t2=t1-1;t2<=4;t2++) {
-##     S0(t1,t2);
-##     S1(t1,t2);
-##   }
-##   for (t2=5;t2<=7;t2++) {
-##     S0(t1,t2);
-##   }
-## }
-## for (t1=7;t1<=8;t1++) {
-##   for (t2=t1-1;t2<=7;t2++) {
-##     S0(t1,t2);
-##   }
-## }
-##
-## This is CLooG's default code generation strategy. It guarantees
-## the lexicographical order as shown in input iteration spaces.
-##
-
-# minimal control overhead, removing overhead from 2-deep loop nest
-codegen 2 r0,r1;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2